U.S. v. Heicklen: The Nullification of Free Speech - Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums
 
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums > Other Discussions/Topics > News Room
Register Forums Garage Garage Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance

Notices

News Room This section is for discussing current events.

Shops/Tuners
Custom Image Corvettes
A&A Corvette
Corvette tuner

Interior
Corvette aftermarket products

Insurance

Parts & Products
Race Ramps
Edelbrock
ATI/Procharger
Corvetteguys.com
Melrose Motorsports
Parts Taxi
Airaid
Mid America Motorworks
Pfadt Racing
Madvette Motorsports
Hi-tech Custom Concepts
Corvette aftermarket products
Corvette Garage
Corvette Parts and Accessories
Corvette Car Care Products
Corvette HID
Mid America Motoroworks

Tracks/Schools
Bob Bondurant School of High Performance Driving
Corvette driving school

Wheels/Tires
Cray Wheels

Services
BADWERKS.com
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2012, 10:40 PM   #1
vfpreacher111
Account Disabled.
 
Posts: 19,914
Member #61087
Member since: Jun 2007
Location: Folsom California USA

My Corvette(s)
69 stingray

Thanks: 32
Thanked 80 Times in 58 Posts
U.S. v. Heicklen: The Nullification of Free Speech

When does free speech go too far ?
---------------------



Prosecution for exercising one’s free speech rights is becoming a trend in the current Administration and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Earlier this month, the Legal Center highlighted the DOJ’s outrageous prosecution of Mary Susan Pine, a pro-life advocate. Thankfully, when the rubber hit the road, the DOJ lawyers had nowhere to go, and the suit was dropped. Pine is able to continue her ministry of standing near an abortion clinic to talk to women about abortion.

Julian P. Heicklen, an 80-year-old retired chemistry professor and advocate of jury nullification, found himself in a similar situation. Heicklen, as part of his activism, would stand in front of courthouses with a “Jury Info” sign, handing out pamphlets and explaining jury nullification to anyone who would approach him.

Advocates of jury nullification believe that jurors can use their de facto power to effectively change the law by refusing to convict a defendant under a law that the juror disagrees with. Heicklen specifically advocated against the enforcement of federal drug laws.

So what was the charge? Heicklen was accused of jury tampering, a federal criminal misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months imprisonment (which, ironically, means that the defendant is not entitled to a jury trial). The law, 18 U.S.C. 1504, prescribes the conviction of anyone who “attempts to influence the action or decision of any grand or petit juror of any court of the United States upon any issue or matter pending before such juror, or before the jury of which he is a member, or pertaining to his duties, by writing or sending to him any written communication, in relation to such issue or matter.” An FBI agent posing as a juror approached Heicklen, received a pamphlet, and asked Heicklen to explain what jury nullification was all about. Heicklen was indicted based on a recording of that conversation.

The case, United States v. Heicklen, resulted in a dismissal of the indictment. In a 27-page opinion, Judge Kimba Wood of the Southern District of New York dissected the construction of the law and also considered Heicklen’s constitutional claims. Wood determined that the language of the statute requires that the jury tampering be done with a specific case in mind. Although Heicklen, through his activism, wanted to influence the “duties” of a juror, he did not also intend to affect an “issue or matter” that came before the jurors.

The DOJ, on the other hand, encouraged the court to accept a broader definition of “issue or matter” that included speech to a juror on any subject that he might be considering. Judge Wood stated that such an expansive interpretation “would arguably chill protected speech” and “would at most render [the law] facially ambiguous.”

Clearly, Heicklen’s opinion on jury nullification is a viewpoint that the DOJ and other law enforcement officials do not want to be widely publicized. Even a man filming Heicklen, photographer Antonio Musumeci, was arrested for doing so. (Charges against Musumeci were dismissed, and his subsequent lawsuit against Homeland Security was also successful.) But as Professor Paul Butler notes, he and many others have been advocating for jury nullification and have been published extensively, so that any potential citizen/juror could have heard and been influenced by him. If Heicklen was found guilty of jury tampering, could the same be done to Musumeci and Butler for further publicizing Heicklen’s message?

No matter what your stance may be on the issues of drug decriminalization or jury nullification, the right to peaceably and reasonably discuss either matter in public should be allowed without question. To arrest someone for discussing a matter of public concern peaceably in a public place—that’s a crime against free speech.

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/...f-free-speech/
vfpreacher111 is offline   Reply w/quote Quick reply to this message
Former Democrat Elbert Guillory:
At the heart of liberalism is the idea that only a great and powerful big government can be the benefactor of social justice for all Americans. But the left is only concerned with one thing — control. And they disguise this control as charity. Programs such as welfare, food stamps, these programs aren’t designed to lift black Americans out of poverty, they were always intended as a mechanism for politicians to control the black community
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-02-2012, 11:07 AM   #2
Batbrain
DC Crew
 
Batbrain's Avatar
 
Posts: 625
Member #61943
Member since: Jun 2007
Location: Springfield, MO

My Corvette(s)
77 L48

Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Before anyone tries to make this into some sort of BS anti-Obama rant, this kind of crap has been going on in regards to this issue for years - probably since at least some time around the Carter/Reagan years. The DoJ really, really doesn't like people knowing about that little legal concept...
Batbrain is offline   Reply w/quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-02-2012, 11:43 AM   #3
Texdentist
 
Texdentist's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,699
Member #76657
Member since: Oct 2008
Location: Crowley, TX

My Corvette(s)
2013 Coupe, 2009 Coupe - traded, '74 Coupe totalled, '77 Coupe sold

Thanks: 55
Thanked 542 Times in 396 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batbrain View Post
Before anyone tries to make this into some sort of BS anti-Obama rant, this kind of crap has been going on in regards to this issue for years - probably since at least some time around the Carter/Reagan years. The DoJ really, really doesn't like people knowing about that little legal concept...
Regardless, it's a couple more examples of how the Constitution is just a pesky little nuisance to the Obama crowd. If I'm not supposed to make this about Obama, then just apply it to Dems in general.
Texdentist is offline   Reply w/quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-02-2012, 09:54 PM   #4
Batbrain
DC Crew
 
Batbrain's Avatar
 
Posts: 625
Member #61943
Member since: Jun 2007
Location: Springfield, MO

My Corvette(s)
77 L48

Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texdentist View Post
Regardless, it's a couple more examples of how the Constitution is just a pesky little nuisance to the Obama crowd. If I'm not supposed to make this about Obama, then just apply it to Dems in general.
It's the government in general. The DoJ went after these guys during the Bush years, too. If you want to try to make this some Obama-only attack on freedom, then you really need to be checked for dementia.
Batbrain is offline   Reply w/quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (12 CHARACTERS MAXIMUM), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
© 2003-2011, DigitalCorvettes.com - All Rights Reserved