The common thread.........

[PNHNDLE96CE]

Originally Posted by Junkman2008

I wonder what they will taste like?

as long as it's fried, I assume it would be Finger licking good x 2. Just my guess.

[Junkman2008]

Originally Posted by 72SBVet

Don't lie Junkman...you know it taste like chicken

[BLK 1]

Originally Posted by Texdentist

Facts backed up by credible sources are the death of pretty much any politically oriented thread.

[PNHNDLE96CE]

Facts are important? I thought post it and they will believe! Wasn't that what the internet was or is. Facts just screw with the results, reality is not something we want to deal with.

[blckslvr79]

Originally Posted by the machine

Believe me all you will hear now is crickets.

Your link is as unprovable as the OP's.

Both are opinion pieces as neither can verify 100% what they are claiming. Both are written from a slant to vilify the other. Neither provides documentation to their espousals.

But if it makes you feel good....

[Junkman2008]

Originally Posted by blckslvr79

Your link is as unprovable as the OP's.

Both are opinion pieces as neither can verify 100% what they are claiming. Both are written from a slant to vilify the other. Neither provides documentation to their espousals.

But if it makes you feel good....

Wait a minute. Most of the stuff in the article that Machine posted is news. A simple search of any news site can verify that. So how is that not verifiable? The debunking that the author did of the initial post can also be verified by doing a simple Google search. Are you dismissing the author's claims because that is the only excuse you can come up with? Dismiss it and it will go away? C'mon man, you're going to have to come stronger than that!

[the machine]

When facts don't suit your argument...just make up new facts.

[BLK 1]

You Tube

You Tube

[the machine]

Originally Posted by blckslvr79

Your link is as unprovable as the OP's. :

Really??? So you cannot check to see if indeed Texas and Virginia register voters with party affiliation. Remember that the original article made certain claims. Two of them that shooters in those two states were registered as democrats. But the fact of the matter is that it is imposible that they were registered as democrats in those states since those states do not register to party affiliation, so that is obviously BULLSHIT.

Originally Posted by blckslvr79

Both are opinion pieces as neither can verify 100% what they are claiming. Both are written from a slant to vilify the other. Neither provides documentation to their espousals.:

There are sections of the article I posted that is oppinion, and the author says so, when he gets into the oppinion part. But the parts where he destroys the original article is hardly opinion, it is just a factual analysis of the claims made by the original article that proves it to be BULLSHIT.

Originally Posted by blckslvr79

But if it makes you feel good....

What makes me feel good, is people dealing with issues based on truth and facts not feelings and fear. And people like you who hold certain positions on gun rights would do better to use actaul truth and facts, than easily disproven BULLSHIT, which wouldn't make any difference anyway.

[Poncherello]

There's only one "p" in opinion, just saying.

[the machine]

Originally Posted by Poncherello

There's only one "p" in opinion, just saying.

Thanks.

[XQIZT]

Originally Posted by Poncherello

There's only one "p" in opinion, just saying.

And there is none in our backyard ool...thank you, we'd like to keep it that way.

[blckslvr79]

Originally Posted by the machine

Really??? So you cannot check to see if indeed Texas and Virginia register voters with party affiliation. Remember that the original article made certain claims. Two of them that shooters in those two states were registered as democrats. But the fact of the matter is that it is imposible that they were registered as democrats in those states since those states do not register to party affiliation, so that is obviously BULLSHIT.




There are sections of the article I posted that is oppinion, and the author says so, when he gets into the oppinion part. But the parts where he destroys the original article is hardly opinion, it is just a factual analysis of the claims made by the original article that proves it to be BULLSHIT.




What makes me feel good, is people dealing with issues based on truth and facts not feelings and fear. And people like you who hold certain positions on gun rights would do better to use actaul truth and facts, than easily disproven BULLSHIT, which wouldn't make any difference anyway.

Not sure why you're choosing to pick on me? I didn't post the original article nor claim it 100% accurate. I claim both articles are fluff. Both based on the writer's personal "Beliefs", not facts. You and the OP are the only ones claiming both articles to be factual. Who's the one basing their argument on feelings and fear???

[blckslvr79]

Originally Posted by Poncherello

There's only one "p" in opinion, just saying.

People tend to mistype when they go on angry rants.

[Texdentist]

Originally Posted by blckslvr79

Not sure why you're choosing to pick on me? I didn't post the original article nor claim it 100% accurate. I claim both articles are fluff. Both based on the writer's personal "Beliefs", not facts. You and the OP are the only ones claiming both articles to be factual. Who's the one basing their argument on feelings and fear???

I think Machine's article is pretty good. The guy is absolutely correct that there are no registered Democrats in Texas, and I assume the same for Virginia. Basically, the onus is on the original author to give some evidence that these people are "registered Democrats", but he gives none. The fact is, it's pretty hard to know who is registered in a political party. About the only way to know is if they state that they are. The author gave no quotes or evidence that any of these people claimed to be registered Democrats. At least the second guy gave some logical rationale for why these claims could not all be true.