Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums banner

1 - 20 of 38 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
BILL

CLINTON's Service Record before becoming Commander in Chief.

The truth must be known. You should see Hillary's file.

Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964, accepting
all contractual conditions of registering for the
draft. Given Selective Service Number 3 26 46 228.


Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.

Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.

Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28, 1969.

Bill Clinton dishonors order to report and is not inducted into the military.


Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States Army.

Reserves on August 07,1969 under authority of Col.E.Holmes. Clinton
signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.

Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at
the University of Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.

Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969, as enlistment with
Army Reserves is revoked by Colonel E. Holmes and
Clinton now AWOL and subject to arrest under Public
Law 90-40 (2)(a) 'registrant who has failed to
report...remain liable for induction'.

Bill Clinton's birth date lottery number is 311,
drawn December 1,1969, but anyone who has already been
ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!

Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a
fugitive from justice under Public Law 90-40.

Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General
(1976), while a fugitive from justice.

Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21, 1977,
from Carter.

Bill Clinton FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON ever to
serve as President.

All these facts come from Freedom of Information
requests, public laws, and various books that have
been published, and have not been refuted by Clinton.

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which
killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton
promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed
five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that
those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi
Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military
personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible
would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa,
which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised
that those responsible would be hunted down and
punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed
17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that
those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an
estimated 3,000 people in
New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead
would be alive today.

AN INTERESTING QUESTION:

This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in
show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate
question.

There are two men, both extremely wealthy.

One develops relatively cheap software and gives
billions of dollars to charity.

The other sponsors terrorism.

That being the case, why was it that the Clinton
Administration spent more money chasing down Bill
Gates over the eight years in office, than Osama bin
Laden?

THINK ABOUT IT!

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8
Million for her forthcoming memoir.

Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be
written.

This from two people who spent 8 years being unable
to recall anything about past events while under oath!

I normally do not get involved in political matters, but this must be known by everyone. If it offends you, I apologize.

Sincerely,
Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret)

P.S. Please forward this to as many people as you
can! We don't want this woman to even THINK of running
for President
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,409 Posts
I've heard bits and pieces of that before. Bottom line question....why wasn't any of that mentioned during the campaigns or during his terms? Certainly the republicans would have gone nuclear with that.

Why does anyone give a rats ass about Hillary's memoirs?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
politics in a corvette forum don't mix very well. bush was also AWOL, but you failed to post that. i, too, can list many things that bush has done in the past, ie, drug use, drinking problems, etc etc. to major lies as president today.
from past experiences in other forums, politics, and religion are two areas that should not be brought up..it causes many hard feelings.
by the admins supporting one political party over another tells me that perhaps you should tell people BEFORE they join that this is a republican right-wing corvette forum?
apparently i've joined the wrong forum...thanks for your time.
MHO only
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
like i stated before, politics and religion in a forum is an open door to heated discussions. i've been there many times and it just causes hard feelings. so, with that in mind, i won't post any facts about bush and my list is just as long as yours. :)
 

·
DC Crew
Joined
·
53,209 Posts
mga said:
by the admins supporting one political party over another tells me that perhaps you should tell people BEFORE they join that this is a republican right-wing corvette forum?
apparently i've joined the wrong forum...thanks for your time.
MHO only
:laughing: You're joking.... right? You are always welcome back, but please know that politics are something people are free to talk about in the Lounge. Wish you would have stuck around to defend your point. Oh well. :(
 

·
DC Crew
Joined
·
53,209 Posts
mga said:
like i stated before, politics and religion in a forum is an open door to heated discussions. i've been there many times and it just causes hard feelings. so, with that in mind, i won't post any facts about bush and my list is just as long as yours. :)
What's wrong with heated discussions as long as people stay mature?

A good vigorous debate is always nice to watch as long as people stay on the point and keep away from personal attacks.

I'm agnostic. Anyone else?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
"All these facts come from Freedom of Information
requests, public laws, and various books that have
been published, and have not been refuted by Clinton."

"I normally do not get involved in political matters, but this must be known by everyone. If it offends you, I apologize."
 

·
DC Crew
Joined
·
53,209 Posts
I'll throw this out there...

I think George Bush II sucks. Sorry, I'm just not impressed with anything he has done. I think he is mediore president at best.

Clinton was MUCH smarter and a much better President than Bush. It's just Clinton made some mistakes and got caught.

Everyone dogs Clinton, yet George Bush was considered a "party animal" at Yale, and he was also known to like the smell of cocaine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
thanks for the offer, but i defended my point by not posting. it would have been hypocritical of me to post my anti-bush list after i made my original statement.
however, i do like to view the C3 forum and learn some new things about my vette as well. i'll just stay away from this section. :) like i said, i've been at other forums when politics was brought up and it caused many hard feelings. maybe i shouldn't have jumped on the admins, after all, you're just allowing freedom of speech to be excersized here, and that's cool too, because that's what it's all about...right?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,627 Posts
Patrick96LT4 said:
What's wrong with heated discussions as long as people stay mature?

A good vigorous debate is always nice to watch as long as people stay on the point and keep away from personal attacks.

I'm agnostic. Anyone else?
Some people don't have the ability to offer a different opinion without losing control. I would have been interested in seeing what he had to say. Oh well. :rolleyes:
 

·
DC Crew
Joined
·
53,209 Posts
mga said:
thanks for the offer, but i defended my point by not posting. it would have been hypocritical of me to post my anti-bush list after i made my original statement.
however, i do like to view the C3 forum and learn some new things about my vette as well. i'll just stay away from this section. :) like i said, i've been at other forums when politics was brought up and it caused many hard feelings. maybe i shouldn't have jumped on the admins, after all, you're just allowing freedom of speech to be excersized here, and that's cool too, because that's what it's all about...right?
Glad to see you are still with us. :thumbsup:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
I like reading people's opinions. That's why I told the other guy to post away. I think Bush II has messed up too in a few areas. Clinton did a few good things and screwed up on a few too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
quote:

"I normally do not get involved in political matters, but this must be known by everyone."

the guy is not a president any more, so why "must this be known by everyone"? makes no sense...he's gone, did his time in the white house and it's over with..time to move on...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
382 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
I believe the guy is thinking that if Clinton would have done more on the terrorism front maybe the Sept. 11 disaster would not have happened.
My opinion on the Gulf War II is that in the first gulf war, Schwartzhopf should have been given the opportunity to kick the Iraqi's rearends back to Bagdad when he had them on the run. Then maybe we wouldn't be there today. Of course hind sight is 20/20.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
749 Posts
sigh..ok, you got me. when clinton did bomb a known site in afghanistan the republican party chatized him for it, (lott, armey, etc) when reagan was the prez, we lost 269 marines in lebanon to terrorist's bombs..remember that? we did nothing about it.
in gulf war 1, our objective was to drive them out of kuwait and back into iraq..mission accomplished.
after 9-11, we found out that the terrorosts were from saudi arabia and financed from people there..so, why the hell are we losing our troops in iraq? there was no correlation between al qaeda and iraq at all, there was no positive proof that iraq was behind them, but the evidence was overwhelming towards saudi arabia. when 9-11 happened, we forgot the pictures of the palestinians dancing and cheering in the streets on CNN. yet, iraq offered condolences along with many other countries.
now, saddam was an asshole, no doubt about that, but we have no right to attack everyone we feel is an asshole on this earth, for if we did, no man would be left standing. the terrorist thing goes back way beyond clinton. they did more damage to us during reagan's admin and we did nothing to stop it then. so, why blame clinton for terrorism today? that's absurd.....
 
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
Top