Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums banner

1 - 20 of 37 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
770 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
By CHARLES J. HANLEY and KARL RITTER
Associated Press Writers

STOCKHOLM (AP) - The ice of Greenland and the rest of the Arctic is melting faster than expected and could help raise global sea levels by as much as 5 feet this century, dramatically higher than earlier projections, an authoritative international assessment says.

The findings "emphasize the need for greater urgency" in combating global warming, says the report of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP), the scientific arm of the eight-nation Arctic Council.

The warning of much higher seas comes as the world's nations remain bogged down in their two-decade-long talks on reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

Rising sea levels are expected to cause some of global warming's worst damage - from inundated small islands to possible flooding of New York City's subways. Oceans will not rise uniformly worldwide, because of currents, winds and other factors, but such low-lying areas as Bangladesh and Florida will likely be hard-hit.

The new report, whose executive summary was obtained by The Associated Press, is to be delivered to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and foreign ministers of the other seven member nations at an Arctic Council meeting next week in Greenland. It first will be discussed by some 400 international scientists at a conference this week in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Drawing on improved research techniques and recent scientific papers, the AMAP report updates forecasts made by the U.N.'s expert panel on climate change in its last major assessment in 2007.

The melting of Arctic glaciers and ice caps, including Greenland's massive ice sheet, is projected to help raise global sea levels by 35 to 63 inches (90 to 160 centimeters) by 2100, AMAP said, although it noted that estimate was highly uncertain.

That's up from the 2007 projection of 7 to 23 inches (19 to 59 centimeters) by the U.N. panel. The U.N. group had left out the possible acceleration of melting in Greenland and Antarctica, saying research on that hadn't advanced sufficiently by the mid-2000s. The U.N. estimate was based largely on the expansion of ocean waters from warming and the runoff from melting land glaciers elsewhere in the world.

Now the AMAP assessment finds that Greenland was losing ice in the 2004-2009 period four times faster than in 1995-2000.

In addition, the cover of sea ice on the Arctic Ocean is shrinking faster than projected by the U.N. panel, threatening the long-term survival of polar bears and other ice-dependent species. Summer ice coverage has been at or near record lows every year since 2001, said AMAP, predicting the ocean will be almost ice-free in the summer in 30 to 40 years.

Arctic temperatures in the past six years were the highest since measurements began in 1880, and "feedback" mechanisms are believed to be speeding up warming in the far north.

One such mechanism involves the ocean absorbing more heat when it's not covered by ice, because ice reflects the sun's energy. That effect has been anticipated by scientists "but clear evidence for it has only been observed in the Arctic in the past five years," AMAP said.

It projected that average fall and winter temperatures in the Arctic will climb by roughly 5 to 11 degrees Fahrenheit by 2080, even if greenhouse gas emissions are lower than in the past decade.

"The observed changes in sea ice on the Arctic Ocean, in the mass of the Greenland ice sheet and Arctic ice caps and glaciers over the past 10 years are dramatic and represent an obvious departure from the long-term patterns," AMAP said.

A leading American ice specialist, Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University, who did not take part in the AMAP assessment, agreed that recent scientific estimates generally support its central finding.

A sea level rise of more than 3 feet this century "fits well within these estimates, and a somewhat higher value cannot be excluded," Alley said.

Scientists have steadily improved ways of measuring the loss of ice into the oceans.

In research reported in March in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, U.S. and European scientists used two independent methods to corroborate their findings: the on-the-ground measurement of ice thickness and movements using GPS stations and other tools, and the measurement of ice mass through gravity readings from satellites.

Led by Eric Rignot of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, they calculated that the accelerating melt of the vast Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets would contribute to an overall sea-level rise of some 13 inches by 2050. They didn't project sea levels to 2100 because of long-range uncertainties, but their work, like AMAP's, significantly updates previous projections.

The AMAP report said melting glaciers and ice sheets worldwide have become the biggest contributor to sea level rise. Greenland's ice sheet alone accounted for more than 40 percent of the 0.12 inches (3.1 millimeters) of sea-level rise observed annually between 2003 and 2008, AMAP said.

The AMAP group's main function is to advise the nations surrounding the Arctic - the U.S., Canada, Russia, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland and Finland - on threats to its environment.

The updated projections should supply further scientific ammunition in the uphill struggle for concerted global action to rein in greenhouse emissions. The failure of emissions-capping legislation in the U.S. Congress last year was one major setback.

"I'm not sure what is more alarming, the glacial pace of Congress to reduce carbon pollution or the astounding rate of melting Arctic ice," Lou Leonard, climate chief at the World Wildlife Fund, said of the new report.

http://www.fox4now.com/story/14561176/new-report-confirms-arctic-melt-accelerating
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
14,241 Posts
The reason conservatives don't care about rising sea levels is because the liberal bastions will go under first. (Manhattan, Miami-Dade, LA, SanFran, and New Orleans.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
677 Posts
Uh oh, I live in Florida, guess I better start saving all my plastic bottles so I can make my own private island.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
You know how you can tell the issue's dead... or at the minimum, on it's last leg ? Not one of the main stream news agencies that I saw... put up an expert to link the tornadoes to global warming. Even the NOAA has stated "tornadoes are not linked to global warming".
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,410 Posts
Not only that, but I live in Fla. right on the Guf of Mexico. Our beach hasn't shrunk by any means in the 7 years I've been here. If anything it's gotten bigger.

Nope, no rising sea levels here. I'll let you know when the water makes the beach a little narrower...if I'm still alive.

I knew I was safe when Al Gore bought his $9 million mansion on the beach.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,206 Posts
I gotta admit, I was a little concerned when my toilet water level was getting higher :lookinup: Then I realized man cannot make enough Co2 to make a difference, only mother nature can.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
9,760 Posts
Is the rise caused by C02 or just natural warming??? I don't know. Is sea level actualy rising?? The experts all over the world say it is but I don't know. All I do know is that if what they say is true, I will be just fine. NY has enough money to build a dike around the entire city. The Jersey shore might end up closer to my house...thats great. The outer banks will be gone, so will myrtle beach...I will miss the golf but there are other courses. Florida will mostly be gone...no worries for me Florida has gotten too hot for me, and I never realy cared for it, except the keys...I will miss the keys. The Pacific coast for the most part rises very sharply so I am sure no one will notice that the cliffs west of 1 are 3 feet shorter. The maps will likely change. We will survive. My properties are all on high ground, so all the floods don't bother me. So just for the record...if and when all those assholes that lose property and get flooded out by all these rising seas and increases in water in the atmosphere start bitching about government helping out....my vote will be **** you. You were warned. :laughing::laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
9,760 Posts
Now that... is a sensible approach. :thumbsup:
And you know damn well that any of these guys denying the rise in sea level now will be first on line to get compensation if they lose their property. Makes me sick to see the assholes who live on the beach get paid to rebuild everytime their house gets wrecked by a huricane....what a waste of tax dollars.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
And you know damn well that any of these guys denying the rise in sea level now will be first on line to get compensation if they lose their property. Makes me sick to see the assholes who live on the beach get paid to rebuild everytime their house gets wrecked by a huricane....what a waste of tax dollars.
Or maybe self funded insurance money. ;)

:rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,410 Posts
And you know damn well that any of these guys denying the rise in sea level now will be first on line to get compensation if they lose their property. Makes me sick to see the assholes who live on the beach get paid to rebuild everytime their house gets wrecked by a huricane....what a waste of tax dollars.
:laughing:
I guess that would be me. No, I've never taken a dime in government handouts for my 'house' being wrecked by a hurricane. We had a tornado come right up the beach and go through my backyard a few weeks back. Put about $14k in damage to our EFIS system. It's all being taken care of by our wind insurance and a local construction property.

Now what might be considered a much bigger waste of tax dollars is the $832 billion stimulus that did nothing except put us all in more debt and only netted a few turtle tunnels.

And the $5 trillion in new debt incurred by the oh so frugal Nancy Pelosi since she became Speaker of the House, or 'Screwer of America'.
 

·
Grey Squirrel
Joined
·
22,780 Posts
:laughing:
I guess that would be me. No, I've never taken a dime in government handouts for my 'house' being wrecked by a hurricane. We had a tornado come right up the beach and go through my backyard a few weeks back. Put about $14k in damage to our EFIS system. It's all being taken care of by our wind insurance and a local construction property.

Now what might be considered a much bigger waste of tax dollars is the $832 billion stimulus that did nothing except put us all in more debt and only netted a few turtle tunnels.

And the $5 trillion in new debt incurred by the oh so frugal Nancy Pelosi since she became Speaker of the House, or 'Screwer of America'.
asshole :laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
:laughing:
I guess that would be me. No, I've never taken a dime in government handouts for my 'house' being wrecked by a hurricane. We had a tornado come right up the beach and go through my backyard a few weeks back. Put about $14k in damage to our EFIS system. It's all being taken care of by our wind insurance and a local construction property.

Now what might be considered a much bigger waste of tax dollars is the $832 billion stimulus that did nothing except put us all in more debt and only netted a few turtle tunnels.

And the $5 trillion in new debt incurred by the oh so frugal Nancy Pelosi since she became Speaker of the House, or 'Screwer of America'.
racist :laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,410 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
Now you are a homophone... or anti... as it were. :laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,410 Posts
Now you are a homophone... or anti... as it were. :laughing:
:rolling: LMAO! That would make me a 'man-phone', or anti- 'man-phone', as it were. :laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
:laughing: when snappy comebacks are not so snappy...
 
1 - 20 of 37 Posts
Top