Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums banner
1 - 20 of 25 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Don't ya miss the good ol days, when Bush was blamed for everything under the sun? I miss Pelosi's "The failed policies of the Bush administration" theme.. :laughing: (* Disclaimer: Yes, we know that **** happens, no one is to blame for high gas prices, the empty treasury, the open borders, and the killing machine stomping through the middle east)

Since BP spill, anti-oil policy has been cited in only 3 network gasoline price reports.

* By Julia A. Seymour
* Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:43 PM EDT

Main Findings:

- Gas prices have risen almost $1-a-gallon since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, yet President Obama's drilling moratorium and other anti-oil policies have barely been mentioned by the networks in that time span.

- Only 1 percent (3 out of 280) of oil price stories since the spill has made any connection between the administration's anti-oil actions and the jump in gasoline prices.

Full Report:

On April 20, 2010, a horrific oil spill took place in the Gulf of Mexico on British Petroleum's (BP) Deepwater Horizon rig. Since that day, gas prices have risen nearly $1-a-gallon to $3.83 per gallon. President Barack Obama's anti-oil policies, including a drilling moratorium are at least part of the reason for that dramatic spike. But you will rarely hear that from the mainstream media.

It certainly isn't the story the network evening news shows have told their viewers since the oil spill. Out of 280 oil price stories since the disastrous pill, just 1 percent (3 out of 280) mentioned any connection between Obama's anti-oil efforts, such as the drilling moratorium, and rapidly rising gas prices.

Instead of asking whether Obama's anti-oil policies could be increasing the cost of gas, the networks blamed other factors such as Mideast turmoil or the "money game" played by speculators. Certainly, the turmoil in Libya, Egypt and surrounding nations has increased worries about oil production and can influence the price. But the networks also should have looked for explanations much closer to home.

ABC "World News with Diane Sawyer" on March 8, 2011, even asked if the gas prices in the "stratosphere" were the result of "gas gouging." ABC's Matt Gutman reported that night, that the nation's most expensive and second most expensive gas stations hadn't posted their prices. He then declared, "Stations like this prey on unwitting travelers hoping to fill up their rental cars on the way to the airport."

After attacking those stations, Gutman admitted "This is technically not price gouging, a legal term which applies only during states of emergency." He told viewers: "In fact, stations can charge as much as they want," but then asserted that is wrong by quoting Mayor Buddy Dyer who said "We don't think this is right, we don't think people should be tricked into paying $2-a-gallon more for gas than they could half a mile down the road."

Of course stations can charge as much as they want, because no one is forced to buy gasoline from them. Consumers can just keep on driving to a station with a lower price. Gutman should have been inquiring about Obama's unwillingness to expand domestic oil production, rather than going on the seasonal media search for service station villains.

During the past year, Shell's former CEO John Hofmeister as well as politicians including Gov. Haley Barbour, R-Miss., have cited Obama administration energy policies for rising gas prices.

Obama and Federal Regulations Strangling Oil Development?

Even though gas prices had bounced up and down and were on the decline in May 2010 after the oil spill, prices have shot up in the past year. Gasoline cost $2.73 per gallon when Obama instituted his sixth-month moratorium on deepwater and shallow drilling on May 30, 2010. Prices are now more than a dollar-a-gallon higher. Pump prices have more than doubled since Obama took office in January 2009.

"After two federal courts said the moratorium was illegal, the Obama administration instead moved to a de facto moratorium, by issuing no permits, while speeding up the permitting process for wind farms," The Heritage Foundation wrote back in December 2010.

Jeff McMahon, a blogger for Forbes, wrote on March 25 that although the administration has begun issuing permits again (five as of that time), those drilling permits weren't "completely new" as the government was claiming. The exploration in question had begun before the moratorium.

"Of 14 permits submitted for initial exploratory drilling in the Gulf-drilling that would be, in other words, new - one has been withdrawn for modification and 13 are listed as 'pending,'" McMahon said.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also seeking to regulate the oil industry over greenhouse gas emissions, and the Bureau of Land Management under Obama appointee Ken Salazar "would issue new rules making it harder to develop natural resources on government-owned land," according to Heritage.

That's not all. On March 15, 2011, American Petroleum Institute (API) released a press release criticizing the administration for new environmental hurdles to a pipeline that would transport crude from Canadian oil sands.

"This much-studied and much-needed pipeline would provide a critical link to our largest energy supplier, Canada, and its vast resources of nearby and available crude oil," Jack Gerard, API's president and CEO, said in the release. API also said the pipeline could mean 13,000 construction jobs in the U.S. and the project could lead to more than 340,000 U.S. jobs eventually.

The pipeline, called Keystone XL, has already been scrutinized for 32 months by 10 federal agencies and many state and local ones, yet "workers are sitting on the sideline waiting for the project to start," according to API.

Yet most of the network stories about gas prices didn't even ask if such policies were contributing to the rise. During the Bush years, the networks did the opposite - criticizing the president for gas prices, asking what the government should do and even entertaining far-left conspiracy theories about gas prices manipulation and election outcomes.

CBS's Couric wondered back in October 2006, "Is this [falling gas prices] an election year present from President Bush to fellow Republicans," while showing an image of bumper sticker that read: "GOP: Grand Oil Party." Following Couric's tease, Mason said: "Gas started going down just as the fall campaign started heating up. Coincidence? Some drivers don't think so."

Others in the media including CNN and Associated Press also ran stories about the supposed oil-price conspiracy.

Networks Blame Speculators, Rather than Obama

Rather than digging deep into those policies and explaining them for viewers, some of the network evening shows also predictably went looking for a business bad guy. NBC found an expert who said "I think you're seeing a tremendous amount of speculation in this market." But that story wasn't nearly as critical of speculation as a CBS segment by Anthony Mason and Katie Couric.

On March 23, 2011, Couric claimed they would "show you who is driving them [gas prices] up" before uttering the scary word "speculation."

The "Grim Reaper" of CBS, Anthony Mason, went on to report that oil futures trading is increasing the cost of oil, and therefore gasoline. He interviewed Michael Greenberger formerly of CFTC who said "It is accelerating the price of oil products, gasoline, heating oil, crude oil, and other energy products, for no good reason."

A bit later Mason said "The CTFC is now considering regulations to curb excessive speculation in oil, which more than ever before has become a money game."

Actually, according to Heritage there is a good reason. The Heritage Foundation explained how trading oil futures works on Feb. 23, 2011: "The oil futures market is just that, a futures market. The price-per-barrel spikes in oil this week have not affected the domestic market yet. In fact, former Shell Oil President John Hofmeister made the prediction in December 2010 that America would face $5/gallon gasoline by 2012, a full month before the revolution in Egypt began."

Hofmeister has previously criticized the Obama administration for the drilling moratorium and at the time of his $5 prediction blamed the "pure politics" keeping "us from drilling more of our resources" for the rising gas prices.

Things are traded based on speculation regarding future prices. With Obama's many policies designed to limit supply of domestic oil or government proposals to raise the gasoline tax, it's no wonder pump prices keep climbing.

One network story noticed that the weak U.S. dollar is also partially responsible for the increase in gas prices.

Jacking Up Prices is 'Green' Lining for President's Agenda

Obama has made green or alternative energy a top priority for his administration, at the expense of domestic fossil fuel sources of energy.

When expressing support of cap-and-trade policy, Obama admitted that "electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." While Obama was talking about coal specifically, it is clear that his environmental agenda is more important to him than maintaining low-cost energy for consumers.

Obama's energy secretary, Steven Chu, shares those same extreme environmentalist leanings. In 2008, Chu said, "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe." With gas prices at $3.83-a-gallon America is well on the way.

Bloomberg Businessweek found that high gas prices actually have a "silver lining" from Obama's perspective because they make consumers more willing to accept his goals.

"Still, there's a silver lining in higher oil prices - or, rather, a green lining - for Obama, who has made clean energy one of his paramount causes. Rising fuel costs could go a long way toward advancing Obama's 'Win the Future' vision of an economy remade by green technologies, including electric vehicles, advanced batteries, wind and solar power, and high-speed trains," they wrote on March 27, 2011. The magazine noted specifically that electric cars become a much better deal when gas prices are high.

Gov. Barbour told NBC "Nightly News" on March 6 the Obama administration was causing prices to rise for that very reason saying, "This administration's policies have been designed to drive up the cost of energy in the name of reducing pollution, in the name of making very expensive alternative fuels more economically competitive."

Methodology

The Business & Media Institute searched Nexis transcripts of ABC "World News," NBC "Nightly News" and CBS "Evening News" for the words "oil" and "price" from the day of the oil spill (April 20, 2010) through March 30, 2011. The searched yielded 280 stories, but only 60 of them mentioned gas prices at all. A meager 3 stories (1 percent of the 280 stories) cited Obama's drilling moratorium or any other Obama policy as a factor in the huge jump in gas prices.

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/articles/201...ing_Ban_in_Just__of_Evening_News_Stories.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,129 Posts
Well no screaming eagle **** batman, I could have told you that. Of coarse I am bias. A few months ago I was talking to a drilling supervisor (Tool Pusher). We were discussing Alaska drilling and he said that environmentalist said that the Caribou might be affected, he said "Fook em, Drill through their skulls!" :rolling:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,823 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
798 Posts
I gotta know, why so much contempt towards the military?
Wish I was getting a $1700 a month raise and a $35,000 interest free loan !!!

:thud:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,823 Posts
not interest free, damn near lol.

with the level of experience I have now, and with the additional responsibilities of that new position/rank, it would easly put me into a $150,000+ career with any major vehicle manufacturer or any large OTR freight company (ie Schnieder National).

USAA provides that loan so you can upgrade your standard of living from that of enlisted/poverty line lifestyle to something more fitting of an officer/warrant officer.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
I gotta know, why so much contempt towards the military?
No contempt, I am a partially disabled veteran, they got my leg, I get to critique.
If you think for 3 seconds that any of these wars, are for the reason you were told, you need to be buying my ocean front property in Oklahoma...

If we don't have the resources to take care of this country, we damn sure don't have the resources for neocon nation building, nor can we afford to be the banksters private army. Yes Tex, I said bankster. If Libya is such a human rights problem, why did their CIA produced "rebels" set up a central bank and start selling oil before anything else? ;)

10 years in Afghanistan and it's worse off now, than before.
8 years in Iraq, and the people hate us more now, than they did in 2003.
Coming ground war in Libya has nothing to do with human rights or revolution.

No contempt for the guys in uniform, just the fascist who are crusading through muslim lands under false pretenses.

:cheers:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,823 Posts
10 years in Afghanistan and it's worse off now, than before.
8 years in Iraq, and the people hate us more now, than they did in 2003.

:cheers:
when was the last time you were in either location? I have been to both 2x over the years, and I can tell you first hand it is better than it was before we went there. And contrary to the media, a majority of the people do not hate us. Again, first hand experience talking....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
10 years in Afghanistan and it's worse off now, than before.
8 years in Iraq, and the people hate us more now, than they did in 2003.
Coming ground war in Libya has nothing to do with human rights or revolution.
Yeah ? You think so ? Do you see either of those countries rioting in the streets for governmental and leadership change... the way you see virtually every other nation in that region ? Why do you think that is ? A better question would be "what do you believe the cause of this, is" ?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
when was the last time you were in either location? I have been to both 2x over the years, and I can tell you first hand it is better than it was before we went there. And contrary to the media, a majority of the people do not hate us. Again, first hand experience talking....
Was it really worth 5000 lives and $1.2 trillion in wealth? Was Saddam a threat to US security? 8 years, really? I don't think so personally, especially when the people telling me about all the good in Iraq, are the same people who rail against any social improvements..

Yeah ? You think so ? Do you see either of those countries rioting in the streets for governmental and leadership change... the way you see virtually every other nation in that region ? Why do you think that is ? A better question would be "what do you believe the cause of this, is" ?
I have my guess, but the bigger question is, why if we are broke, do you support redistributing my wealth into the middle east, where they have been fighting for 2000 years and show no sign of stopping in the near future? What exactly do you hope to gain?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
Less then 1% of GDP over the last 10 years ? Yes... yes I do. How many Americans were being killed before we were at war ? How many now ?

You seem to forget that we are not the instigators of this war. We and our interests were repeatedly attacked... and we did virtually nothing. Would you continue to do nothing ?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Less then 1% of GDP over the last 10 years ? Yes... yes I do. How many Americans were being killed before we were at war ? How many now ?
:laughing: Get off the gas man, you cry about Obama's cooked books, then use Bush's cooked books as a reference? Come on man..

You seem to forget that we are not the instigators of this war. We and our interests were repeatedly attacked... and we did virtually nothing. Would you continue to do nothing ?
Attacked by people WE CREATED. So, your answer, is to go create more? That's the very DEFINITION of insanity, and you know it.. and 10 years is more than enough, if the mightiest military on the planet can't beat cavemen in a decade, maybe it's time to focus attention and resources on the homeland, and I am not talking about the NAZI DHS.. created by BUSH and his Patriot Act horseshit.

If you don't want people ****ing around in your backyard, don't **** around in theirs... ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
I just can't do it. I've really tried. I can not be a libertarian. It's just not in me to be a pacifist.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
I just can't do it. I've really tried. I can not be a libertarian. It's just not in me to be a pacifist.
WTF is pacifist about not getting pissed off when one of your creations turns on you? :laughing:

**** me.. this is not rocket science, you and I know Bin Laden and Al Qeda were created by the US government. You and I both know, the US government turned down the chance to take Bin Laden before 911. You and I both know, Bin Laden and Al Qeda are the reason we are in Afghanistan.

HTF is this pacifist? :laughing:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,823 Posts
WTF is pacifist about not getting pissed off when one of your creations turns on you? :laughing:

**** me.. this is not rocket science, you and I know Bin Laden and Al Qeda were created by the US government. You and I both know, the US government turned down the chance to take Bin Laden before 911. You and I both know, Bin Laden and Al Qeda are the reason we are in Afghanistan.

HTF is this pacifist? :laughing:
The DoD, CIA, NIA all had numerous opportinities to take bin laden out. Unfortunately this requires presidential approval and clinton would only allow action on him if part of a valid capture mission....too bad it is much easier to take someone out from 1.5 miles away than it is to capture someone....
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
The DoD, CIA, NIA all had numerous opportinities to take bin laden out. Unfortunately this requires presidential approval and clinton would only allow action on him if part of a valid capture mission....too bad it is much easier to take someone out from 1.5 miles away than it is to capture someone....
So, where is the pacifism? :huh:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
WTF is pacifist about not getting pissed off when one of your creations turns on you? :laughing:

**** me.. this is not rocket science, you and I know Bin Laden and Al Qeda were created by the US government. You and I both know, the US government turned down the chance to take Bin Laden before 911. You and I both know, Bin Laden and Al Qeda are the reason we are in Afghanistan.

HTF is this pacifist? :laughing:
"Created", my ass. First you say it's two thousand years of fighting... then the very forming of the US and it's interests are the cause of their fighting each other and us.

You're sounding more and more like Jeremiah Wright... America... the cause of everything ! -and nothing.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,823 Posts
when did i ever say anything about someone being a pacifist?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,914 Posts
I called his belief "pacifist".
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
"Created", my ass.
Oh, were you still a Canuck when the US government "created" Bin Laden to **** with the soviets in Afghanistan? :laughing: :crazy:

First you say it's two thousand years of fighting... then the very forming of the US and it's interests are the cause of their fighting each other and us.
Those people have been fighting for 2000 years, well documented.

You're sounding more and more like Jeremiah Wright... America... the cause of everything ! -and nothing.
:laughing: You already know you can't pull that crap with me.. quit trying. I can out right-wing you all day, and I can do it without the neocon-isms.

Now, had the government not been fooling around with other people's country's for the last 80 years, I would agree. The problem is, this Bush/Neocon doctrine of pre-emptive strikes and hollow "humanitarian" horseshit don't fly. It's been disproven, by the very people who wrote it. The neocon ideology is no more constitutional, than Obamacare..

It failed in Vietnam, i failed in Iraq, it failed in Afghanistan, it failed in Korea, it's a failed argument. You can't bring people, what they don't want. The only people who can bring freedom to a country, is the people of that country. Freedom can't be given, it must be taken. Setting up puppet governments to do your bidding won't work, never has.

Now, let's quit wasting money, time, lives over there and waste money, time over here. :thumbsup:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,109 Posts
with the level of experience I have nowve now, and with the additional responsibilities of that new position/rank, it would easly put me into a $150,000+ career with any major vehicle manufacturer or any large OTR freight company (ie Schnieder National).
omg....:lookinup:

Keep dreaming......
:laughing:
 
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Top