Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
19,925 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
As Congress struggles to negotiate a budget deal to keep the government running, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) told lawmakers Wednesday that the GOP version of the budget bill would result in the deaths of at least 70,000 children who depend on American food and health assistance around the world.

"We estimate, and I believe these are very conservative estimates, that H.R. 1 would lead to 70,000 kids dying," USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah testified before the House Appropriations State and Foreign Ops subcommittee.

"Of that 70,000, 30,000 would come from malaria control programs that would have to be scaled back specifically. The other 40,000 is broken out as 24,000 would die because of a lack of support for immunizations and other investments and 16,000 would be because of a lack of skilled attendants at birth," he said.

The Republican bill, known as H.R.1, was passed by the House, and would fund the government for the rest of fiscal 2011. It would effectively cut 16 percent from the Obama administration's original fiscal 2011 request for the international affairs account.

Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL) pointed out that H.R. 1 would provide $430 million for the International Disaster Assistance (IDA) account, which is 50 percent below the president's fiscal 2011 request and 67 percent below fiscal 2010 levels.

Shah said that such a cut "would be, really, the most dramatic stepping back away from our humanitarian responsibilities around the world in decades." The IDA account supports 1.6 million people in Darfur, so halving the account would place 800,000 people at risk, he said.

"[T]his would lead to a significant amount of reduction in feeding programs, medical programs and food and water programs for people who are incredibly vulnerable," he added.

Shah was also testifying in defense of the administration's fiscal 2012 budget request, which also faces the axe on Capitol Hill. Subcommittee Chairwoman Kay Granger (R-TX) opened the hearing by announcing that the administration's fiscal 2012 request was dead on arrival.

"While I understand the value of many of these important programs, the funding request for next year is -- is truly unrealistic in today's budget environment," she said. "We simply cannot fund everything that has been funded in the past. And we certainly cannot continue to fund programs that are duplicative and wasteful."

Granger said she would support USAID programs that have national security implications or contribute to the ongoing missions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Her Democratic counterpart, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), said that national security is threatened by instability in other parts of the world as well.

"Drastic cuts to USAID would risk a great deal in stability and security around the world which could spawn the kinds of threats that cost this country the lives of men and women in uniform and billions in treasure," she said.

Shah argued that foreign assistance is crucial to the long term economic recovery because it helps develop markets for American goods.

"USAID's work also strengthens America's economic security. By establishing links to consumers at the bottom of the pyramid, we effectively position American countries to enter more markets and sell more goods in the economies of the future, promoting exports and creating American jobs," he said.


http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/03/31/shah_gop_budget_would_kill_70000_children
 

· Banned
Joined
·
14,241 Posts
If your region cannot support the number of people who live there, they should either move or die, NOT beg others to pay for their lives.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
31,437 Posts
If your region cannot support the number of people who live there, they should either move or die, NOT beg others to pay for their lives.
Personally, I think we can afford our own poor people... but first we gotta quit electing democrats and republicans who envision imperialism before domestic needs. We can afford the entitlements for those who need/earned them, but first we gotta get DC to quit pouring our money down dry holes.

Cut the defense budget by 2/3rds, close the border, reform SS/Med and make the money untouchable, start a massive infrastructure rebuilding program, shut down the department of energy, tell the enviroweenies to get humped so we can pursue our own resources.

:laughing: Like anyone would vote for any of that.. Rome is falling once again, almost identically to the first time.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
9,722 Posts
Personally, I think we can afford our own poor people... but first we gotta quit electing democrats and republicans who envision imperialism before domestic needs. We can afford the entitlements for those who need/earned them, but first we gotta get DC to quit pouring our money down dry holes.

Cut the defense budget by 2/3rds, close the border, reform SS/Med and make the money untouchable, start a massive infrastructure rebuilding program, shut down the department of energy, tell the enviroweenies to get humped so we can pursue our own resources.

:laughing: Like anyone would vote for any of that.. Rome is falling once again, almost identically to the first time.
:agree: and we don't even need the lead poisoning, to make us do insane things.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
25,310 Posts
The leftists and environmentalists are responsible for the deaths of literally millions of people over the last 40 years because they wrongly banned DDT, stopped it's production, and released malaria which was fairly well controlled to kill millions in third world countries. And they try to make the Pubs look like they are responsible for 70k deaths. Typical hypocricy from the Dems. Here is one article about it and Google has many more.

http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/Environment/ddt_vs_death.htm
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,517 Posts
Personally, I think we can afford our own poor people... but first we gotta quit electing democrats and republicans who envision imperialism before domestic needs

reform SS/Med and make the money untouchable, start a massive infrastructure rebuilding program, shut down the department of energy, tell the enviroweenies to get humped so we can pursue our own resources.
Yeah these environmentalist are the source of many problems
in the U.S.A

Also Obama never said he was going to make Libya a better place to live while he was running for president

Thus he's just another expensive Mistake

We need Quit tapping these dry holes and dumping our Tax dollars down them

Then take that money and invest it in America

The middle east has Bad written all over it

Thus We need to get out of there, In order to make America strong again
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,797 Posts
I say let them die....while we dump billions into aid for starving people in OTHER countries, we should be spending that locally. Let those 3rd world ****-hole countries fend for themselves. Natural Selection at work here people.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top