Corvette Forum : DigitalCorvettes.com Corvette Forums banner

1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,109 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
"... our internet makes it harder for U.S. entrepreneurs to compete in global markets. As evidence, consider that the U.S. came in dead last in another recent study that compared how quickly 40 countries and regions have been progressing toward a knowledge-based economy over the past 10 years"


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=competition-and-the-internet



Why Broadband Service in the U.S. Is So Awful


The average U.S. household has to pay an exorbitant amount of money for an Internet connection that the rest of the industrial world would find mediocre. According to a recent report by the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, broadband Internet service in the U.S. is not just slower and more expensive than it is in tech-savvy nations such as South Korea and Japan; the U.S. has fallen behind infrastructure-challenged countries such as Portugal and Italy as well.

The consequences are far worse than having to wait a few extra seconds for a movie to load. Because broadband connections are the railroads of the 21st century—essential infrastructure required to transmit products (these days, in the form of information) from seller to buyer—our creaky Internet makes it harder for U.S. entrepreneurs to compete in global markets. As evidence, consider that the U.S. came in dead last in another recent study that compared how quickly 40 countries and regions have been progressing toward a knowledge-based economy over the past 10 years. “We are at risk in the global race for leadership in innovation,” FCC chairman Julius Genachowski said recently. “Consumers in Japan and France are paying less for broadband and getting faster connections. We’ve got work to do.”

It was not always like this. A decade ago the U.S. ranked at or near the top of most studies of broadband price and performance. But that was before the FCC made a terrible mistake. In 2002 it reclassified broadband Internet service as an “information service” rather than a “telecommunications service.” In theory, this step implied that broadband was equivalent to a content provider (such as AOL or Yahoo!) and was not a means to communicate, such as a telephone line. In practice, it has stifled competition.

Phone companies have to compete for your business. Even though there may be just one telephone jack in your home, you can purchase service from any one of a number of different long-distance providers. Not so for broadband Internet. Here consumers generally have just two choices: the cable company, which sends data through the same lines used to deliver television signals, and the phone company, which uses older telephone lines and hence can only offer slower service.

The same is not true in Japan, Britain and the rest of the rich world. In such countries, the company that owns the physical infrastructure must sell access to independent providers on a wholesale market. Want high-speed Internet? You can choose from multiple companies, each of which has to compete on price and service. The only exceptions to this policy in the whole of the 32-nation Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development are the U.S., Mexico and the Slovak Republic, although the Slovaks have recently begun to open up their lines.

A separate debate—over net neutrality, the principle that Internet providers must treat all data equally regardless of their origin or content—has put the broadband crisis back in the spotlight. Earlier this year a federal appeals court struck down the FCC’s plan to enforce net neutrality, saying that because the FCC classified the Internet as an information service, it does not have any more authority to ensure that Internet providers treat all content equally than it does to ensure that CNN treats all political arguments equally. In response, the FCC announced its intention to reclassify broadband Internet as a telecommunications service. The move would give the FCC power to enforce net neutrality as well as open broadband lines up to third-party competition, enabling free markets to deliver better service for less money.




Yet, puzzlingly, the FCC wants to take only a half-step. Genachowski has said that although he regards the Internet as a telecommunications service, he does not want to bring in third-party competition.

This move may have been intended to avoid criticism from policy makers, both Republican and Democrat, who have aligned themselves with large Internet providers such as AT&T and Comcast that stand to suffer when their local monopolies are broken.


It is frustrating, however, to see Gena-chowski acknowledge that the U.S. has fallen behind so many other countries in its communications infrastructure and then rule out the most effective way to reverse the decline. We call on the FCC to take this important step and free the Internet."


:down:




too bad we are to broke to upgrade our old infastructures to keep up with the innovation pace.:down:


well.......

Our middle class and govt are broke,........ at least.....:rolleyes:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
31,366 Posts
I think they should borrow a couple more trillion from china and give us all free internet. :huh:

Beats the hell out of borrowing it and giving it to the banks.. :laughing:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
I think they should borrow a couple more trillion from china and give us all free internet. :huh:

Beats the hell out of borrowing it and giving it to the banks.. :laughing:
Since they already own us, I think China should just supply us with free internet. :thumbsup: China has let us down.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,253 Posts
This entire article is bullshit. Net neutrality is simply another way the left wants to put the government in control of our lives. There is no evidence that ISP's are slowing down anyone's access to the internet. That concept is a red herring being used to hand over power to the feds. The main reason we lag behind, statistically, much smaller countries is our size. If you go to the urban areas, the interntet speeds available will match Japan, Korea, etc. If you average in all of the vast rural and semi-rural middle America, our numbers come down. These kinds of articles drive me crazy because they appear to be techinically driven, when in fact, they are politically driven.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,516 Posts
Since they already own us, I think China should just supply us with free internet. :thumbsup: China has let us down.
yeah the communists *won* the cold war,

And you all have the traitors in Government & American industry to Thank for that ! :nuts:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
yeah the communists *won* the cold war,

And you all have the traitors in Government & American industry to Thank for that ! :nuts:
"You all"???? :laughing:

Has Kommiefornia finally left the union? You're as much a part as we are brother. :cheers:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,476 Posts
This entire article is bullshit. Net neutrality is simply another way the left wants to put the government in control of our lives. There is no evidence that ISP's are slowing down anyone's access to the internet. That concept is a red herring being used to hand over power to the feds. The main reason we lag behind, statistically, much smaller countries is our size. If you go to the urban areas, the interntet speeds available will match Japan, Korea, etc. If you average in all of the vast rural and semi-rural middle America, our numbers come down. These kinds of articles drive me crazy because they appear to be techinically driven, when in fact, they are politically driven.
Good points.
I agree.

Besides.....who ****ing cares? My porn plays just fine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,052 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,516 Posts
"You all"???? :laughing:

Has Kommiefornia finally left the union? You're as much a part as we are brother. :cheers:
I'm a real American

I didn't invite these M'fk'ers in here

I know better than that And would never sell my country out for a few dollars


Instead I would invest my money in its Infrastructure :nuts:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
710 Posts
Internet speeds in the US may lag behind those of 3rd word countries, but not due to infrastrusture. The biggest obsticle is traffic. The US has the greates % of its people with access to the internet than any other nation.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,206 Posts
I still think our infrastructure beats their infrastructure:laughing:

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,516 Posts
Here, Imma' Bring you Boys up to date *2011*



 

·
Banned
Joined
·
12,109 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
These kinds of articles drive me crazy because they appear to be techinically driven, when in fact, they are politically driven.
Scientific American?

:laughing: disagree.




Now........


I posted it to appear to post a technically driven post, when in fact, I was politically driven....
That much is true.:D
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top